This realization of how I had originally failed to give a broader context to the current course is what I interpreted the passage from the Wood, Bruner, & Ross article quoted by Sara to describe, or at least as it applied to my situation as a new teacher.
I think that the scaffolding design laid out in the Common Syllabus works to the advantage of both the students and new instructors with little experience in curriculum design and lesson planning. I agree, however, that the Common Syllabus serves best as a reference guide rather than a strict, unyeilding agenda. The pace of learning needs room for some flexibility.
On the topic of class size and individual levels of competence, I think the strategy of group work is beneficial. Students with more understanding helping those with less. It might help to keep students ahead of the curve from losing interest, foster camaraderie, and bring along those less adept a bit faster. I also like the multi-modal approach to engage differing learning styles. The variety of instruction improves attentiveness.
I also found that my students were less than enthusiastic about the Etext ---- most of them stated a preference for a hardcopy text.
Writing Process Rap
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNk41LZoxAs
(Warning! Not all that impressive, but it did remind me of a few of my students)
No comments:
Post a Comment